MCP audits, tool by tool.
Code-level and design-level audit of your Model Context Protocol server. Tool authorization, schema design, trust model, and the integration surface where the model meets your data.
MCP gives a model your tools. Treat that seriously.
Every tool you expose through MCP is a privilege you’ve granted to a model that can be manipulated by anyone with text in its context window. Tool descriptions are attack surface. Schemas are attack surface. The trust between client and server is attack surface. The audit covers all of it.
What’s in the audit.
Tool authorization and isolation
Prompt confusion at the tool boundary
Client-server boundary
Scoped to your server.
MCP audits are sized to tool count, schema complexity, and transport configuration. Talk to us for a scope and quote.
Questions.
A code-level and design-level review of your Model Context Protocol server. We audit the transport, the tool surface, the schemas, the auth model, and the trust assumptions between the server and any connecting client.
Yes, on request. Client-side audits cover how the agent decides which MCP server to trust, how it handles tool descriptions, and how it constrains what tools the model can invoke.
Yes — we publish on the discipline regularly. See the research below for examples including a design flaw analysis in the Anthropic MCP SDK and the broader MCP breach index.
Yes. The MCP ecosystem distributes tools as packages; we review dependency trust, signing, and the supply-chain integrity of anything your server pulls in.
Standard scope. We cover the HTTPS transport, auth tokens, session handling, and rate-limit behavior. The audit also tags chain-of-custody assumptions explicitly.
Two to four weeks for typical scope. We scope and quote against your specific server before you commit.
Go deeper.
Need something else?
Ready to audit your MCP server?
Send us your server repo and a target date. We’ll come back with a scope and a quote within 24 hours.