F-2025-0010·missing-input-validation

Missing input validation in pixelToBits() leads to undefined behavior and invalid bitmap generation

Acknowledgedlotterypixel-lotterychainlink-vrf
TL;DR

pixelToBits() accepts any uint32 with no bounds check against MAX_PIXEL_NUMBER. External callers can pass out-of-range pixel values and produce undefined bitmap output.

Severity
INFO
Impact
LOW
Likelihood
LOW
Method
MManual review
CAT.
Complexity
LOW
Exploitability
LOW
02Section · Description

Description

The pixelToBits() function in PixelToBitmapAPELib lacks input validation to ensure the pixel parameter is within the valid range (0 to MAX_PIXEL_NUMBER = 98,279). While the function documentation states it accepts pixels "0 to MAX_PIXEL_NUMBER", there is no runtime check to enforce this constraint.

The function is declared public, making it accessible to any external caller, including future integrations, off-chain tools, and other contracts that may not implement proper input validation.

03Section · Recommendation

Recommendation

Add input validation to pixelToBits():

solidity
function pixelToBits(uint32 pixel) public pure returns (uint32 bitmap) {
// Add input validation
if (pixel > MAX_PIXEL_NUMBER) revert InvalidInputNumber();
// ... rest of function
}
04Section · Resolution

Resolution

Golden Grid: Acknowledged.

Zealynx: Advised to implement it for extra caution.

F-2025-0010

oog
zealynx

Smart Contract Security Digest

Monthly exploit breakdowns, audit checklists, and DeFi security research — straight to your inbox

© 2026 Zealynx